🔗 Share this article

Ken Burns is now considered more than a filmmaker; he is a brand, a one-man industrial complex. Whenever he releases documentary series premiering on the television, everyone seeks an interview.

The filmmaker completed “more fucking podcasts than I ever thought possible”, he remarks, approaching the conclusion of his extensive publicity circuit comprising four dozen cities, dozens of preview events and innumerable conversations. “There seems to be a podcast for every citizen, and I believe I’ve appeared on most of them.”

Happily the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, equally articulate in interviews as he is accomplished while filmmaking. At seventy-two has traveled from prestigious venues to popular podcasts to talk about a career-defining series: The American Revolution, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that consumed a substantial portion of his recent years and arrived this week on PBS.

Timeless Filmmaking Method

Comparable to methodical preparation amidst instant gratification culture, this documentary series intentionally classic, more redolent of The World at War than the era of online content and podcast series.

But for Burns, who has built a career chronicling strands of US history spanning various American subjects, the revolutionary period transcends ordinary historical coverage but fundamental. “I said this to my co-director Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns reflects by phone from New York.

Comprehensive Scholarly Work

The filmmaking team along with writer Geoffrey Ward referenced countless written sources and primary source materials. Multiple academic experts, spanning age and perspective, contributed scholarly insights along with leading scholars covering various specialties like African American history, first nations scholarship and imperial studies.

Signature Documentary Style

The film’s approach will feel familiar to devotees of The Civil War. Its distinctive style included gradual camera movements through archival photographs, extensive employment of contemporary scores featuring talent reading diaries, letters and speeches.

That was the moment Burns established his reputation; years later, presently the respected veteran of historical films, he seems able to recruit any actor he chooses. Appearing alongside Burns during a recent appearance, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”

Extraordinary Talent

The decade-long production schedule proved beneficial in terms of flexibility. Recordings took place at professional facilities, in relevant places and remotely via Zoom, a tool embraced throughout the health crisis. The director describes the experience with performer Josh Brolin, who scheduled a brief window while in Georgia to record his lines portraying the founding father then continuing to subsequent commitments.

Additional performers feature Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, Jeff Daniels, Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, emerging and established stars, multiple generations of actors, accomplished dramatic artists, British and American talent, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

Burns emphasizes: “Honestly, this could represent the finest ensemble recruited for any project. Their work is exceptional. Selection wasn’t based on fame. I became frustrated when someone asked, regarding the famous participants. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They represent global acting excellence and they can bring this stuff alive.”

Historical Complexity

However, the absence of living witnesses, visual documentation forced Burns and his team to lean heavily on historical documents, weaving together individual perspectives of multiple revolutionary participants. This allowed them to show spectators not only to the “bold-faced names” of that era but also to “dozens of others who are seminal to the story”, numerous individuals lack visual representation.

The filmmaker also explored his personal passion for maps and spatial representation. “I have great affection for cartography,” he notes, “and there are more maps in this project compared to previous works across my complete filmography.”

Global Significance

Filmmakers captured footage at numerous significant sites across North America plus English locations to document environmental context and collaborated substantially with re-enactors. These components unite to present a narrative more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing versus conventional understanding.

The revolution, it contends, represented more than local dispute concerning territory, taxes and political voice. Conversely, the project presents a blood-soaked struggle that eventually involved more than two dozen nations and surprisingly represented termed “humanity’s highest ideals”.

Brother Against Brother

Early dissatisfaction and objections leveled at London by far-flung British subjects in 13 fractious colonies quickly evolved into a vicious internal war, dividing communities and households and turning communities into battlegrounds. In episode two, academic Alan Taylor comments: “The greatest misconception about the American Revolution is that it was something a unifying experience for colonists. It leaves out the reality that colonists battled fellow colonists.”

Nuanced Understanding

According to his perspective, the revolutionary narrative that “generally is overwhelmed by emotionalism and idealization and remains shallow and doesn’t have the respect actual events, and all the participants and the widespread bloodshed.”

It was, he contends, an uprising that declared the revolutionary principle of fundamental personal liberties; a vicious internal conflict, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; plus an international conflict, the fourth in a series of struggles among European powers for the “prize of North America”.

Contingent Historical Events

The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the